عنوان مقاله [English]
Unless there is a change of waqf, except in certain cases, there is a consensus among the Shi'a jurisprudents. However, the reason for not accepting it is not a conspiracy between them. Some believe that the reason for not accepting it is because of the religious order that has been banned. Another group says that the nature of the waqf is in a way that is in conflict with any change, and the narratives that imply prohibit all have an aspect of approval, not decree and establishment. The third category says that the reason for the transfer of the waqf is due to the fact that after the endowment of the acquaintance, the endowment is removed from the property of the wizard and no longer falls into the property of anyone and the jaw becomes property. Based on these three bases, the second promise is accepted and defendable, which is not dedicated to the truth of the law and is a human covenant, which goes beyond religion and religion, throughout all time and among all the nations of the world. In addition, it has historical and narrative proofs.