@article { author = {Sarafraz, Mohammad Ali and Sadeghi, Mohammad and Maghsud, Jafar}, title = {Effects and Rulings of Returning to the Property after Ignoring in Imamiyah Jurisprudence}, journal = {Fiqh}, volume = {29}, number = {111}, pages = {158-183}, year = {2022}, publisher = {Islamic Propagation Office, Qom Seminary Islamic Sciences and Culture Academy}, issn = {1735-3181}, eissn = {1735-3521}, doi = {10.22081/jf.2022.61649.2349}, abstract = {Withdrawal from ignoring the property, which means cancelling the legal action performed based on the principle of freedom and the governance of the human will, is the right of every owner, and the religious legislator has recognized it with conditions. Because of exercising this right, the ownership of the ignored property will be again for its first owner. The main purpose of this paper is to answer what are the effects and rulings of ignoring the property. It is an answer that satisfies the society's expectations from Islamic jurisprudence for such disputes by resolving the disputes between the ignorer and the receiver of the property. Therefore, to achieve this goal, the paper was conducted in a descriptive-analytical method. The finding of this study based on the arguments is that it is permissible only in some of its forms to withdraw from ignoring the property as a unilateral legal act such as a contractual will. That is, this unilateral act is permissible and reversible only when no one has taken possession of the ignored property, but in case of seizure or possession by others, there will be no possibility of withdrawal of the first owner. The finding of this study is to solve some social conflicts when there is a difference between the first owner and the recipient of the property during the conflict of interests. . Another result is the clarification of the ruling on property ownership, which has been left undecided due to withdrawal from ignoring and has been removed from the economic cycle of the society.}, keywords = {Effects,illegal possession,rulings,ignoring the property,possession,Withdrawal}, title_fa = {آثار و احکام بازگشت به ملک پس از اعراض در فقه امامیه}, abstract_fa = {عدول از اعراض از ملک به‌معنای انصراف از عمل حقوقی انجام‌شده بر اساس اصل آزادی و حاکمیت اراده در انسان، حق هر مالک است و شارع نیز آن را با شرایطی به‌رسمیت شناخته است. در نتیجهٔ اعمال این حق، مالکیت مال مورداعراض به مالک اول آن بازمی‌گردد. هدف اصلی این مقاله، پاسخ به چیستی آثار و احکام عدول از اعراض از ملک است؛ پاسخی که با حل اختلافات میان اعراض‌کننده و گیرنده ملک، انتظار جامعه را از فقه اسلامی برای این‌گونه اختلافات برآورده می‌سازد. براین‌اساس برای تحقق این هدف، مقاله به‌شیوه توصیفی-تحلیلی انجام شد. یافته این تحقیق براساس ادله این است که عدول از اعراض را به‌عنوان عمل حقوقی ایقاعی مانند وصیت عهدی، تنها در بعضی از صور آن جایز می‌داند؛ یعنی این ایقاع تنها زمانی جایز و قابل‌رجوع است که هیچ‌کس در مال اعراض‌شده تصرف نکرده باشد، اما درصورت قبض یا تصرف دیگران، امکان عدول مالک اول وجود نخواهد داشت. نتیجه این تحقیق، حل برخی منازعات اجتماعی در هنگام اختلاف میان مالک اول و گیرنده مال در زمان تعارض منافع است. نتیجه دیگر، روشن‌شدن حکم مالکیت اموالی است که به‌سبب عدول از اعراض بلاتکلیف مانده و از چرخه اقتصاد جامعه خارج شده است.}, keywords_fa = {آثار,اباحه تصرف,احکام,اعراض از ملک,تملک,عدول}, url = {https://jf.isca.ac.ir/article_73407.html}, eprint = {https://jf.isca.ac.ir/article_73407_80b2703fde973a82c988addfd557390a.pdf} }